Your stack is connected.
Your context isn't.

Slack, GitHub, Linear, your docs, they're all wired together, and your agents can technically read most of them. What none of that wiring gives you is the actual answer to "what did we decide, and why." Thor consolidates truth that's scattered across Slack, GitHub, Linear, docs, and meetings into one living, checked record, proposing structured updates that a person approves before anything becomes official.

Why does your coding agent keep asking questions your team already answered?

Because the answer isn't where the agent is looking. Most coding agents read whatever tool you point them at and treat it as current. The real answer usually lives in a Slack thread or a meeting that never made it back into the ticket.

Slack thread

#eng-platform

Let's ship behind a flag for this rollout.

3d ago

GitHub Issue

#4631

Need decision on flag rollout strategy.

2d ago

Linear Ticket

ENG-1526

Waiting on go-ahead for phased launch

1d ago

Thor living record

#eng-platform

Verified

Ship behind a flag

Frida Jones · Approved

Today, 10:53 AM

Where the context layer goes deep

Day Zero

Problem definition before your agent starts

In Progress

Sourced, reversible, governed

The three promises, explained

In Progress

Why MCP isn't enough

Where raw tool access stops

In Progress

Context for coding agents

Connecting Claude Code, Cursor

In Progress

The living model, explained

How the record stays current

In Progress

Thor vs. AI-teammate tools

Viktor, Stilla, Modem, Supermemory and the rest

View

Thor vs. context-graph tools

Comparison, ready to draft

In Progress

Thor vs. suite AI

Comparison, needs teardowns

In Progress

Thor vs. coding agents

Comparison, needs teardowns

In Progress

Thor doesn't decide anything on its own, and it doesn't let an agent act without a person in the loop. Small, easily-undone updates can go through automatically under clear rules; anything that creates a real commitment waits for a person.

FAQs

How is this different from raw MCP?
An MCP server gives an agent a way to read a tool. It doesn't tell the agent whether what it's reading is still accurate. Thor keeps one checked record of what the team decided, so agents aren't reconstructing the answer from a stale ticket every time.
Does Thor let my agents make changes without a person approving?
No. Thor doesn't decide anything on its own, and it doesn't let an agent act without a person in the loop. Small, easily-undone updates can go through automatically under clear rules; anything that creates a real commitment waits for a person.
Does this replace Claude Code, Cursor, or our other coding agents?
No. Those tools still write the code. Thor is the record they read: what was decided, who owns it, and whether it's still true. Agents connect through Thor MCP so they aren't guessing from a ticket that never caught up with Slack.